Advanced Search

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

We are constantly working to improve the site, and to add more laws to our database. If you are receiving value from using our site please consider signing up for a subscription to support the site and to get many additional benefits for you.

Key Benefits:

  • Unlimited Searches
  • Weekly Updates on New Laws
  • Access to 5,345,848 Global Laws from 110 Countries
  • View the Original Law Side-by-Side with the Translation
  • No Ads

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.

(You can close this ad by clicking anywhere on the page.)

Statement Of The Constitutional Court That Article 55 Paragraph 1 Lit. G, Certain Phrases In § 55 Section 4 And Section 102 Paragraph 1 Lit. H Of The 1959 Water Law Were Contrary To The Constitution

Original Language Title: Ausspruch des Verfassungsgerichtshofes, dass § 55 Abs. 1 lit. g, bestimmte Wortfolgen in § 55 Abs. 4 und § 102 Abs. 1 lit. h des Wasserrechtsgesetzes 1959 verfassungwidrig waren

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.

24. Representing of the Federal Chancellor on the ruling of the Constitutional Court, that Section 55 (1) (g), certain phrases in § 55 (4) and § 102 (1) (1) (1). h of the law of water law in 1959 were illegal

According to Art. 140 (5) B-VG as well as in accordance with Section 64 (2) and § 65 of the Constitutional Court Act 1953, BGBl. No. 85/1953, is made known:

The Constitutional Court, with the recognition of 16 March 2012, G 126 /11-12, delivered to the Federal Chancellors on 5 April 2012, rightly recognized:

" § 55 para. 1 lit. g and the phrases " , in the case of the party position (§ 102 para. 1 lit. h) "as well as" in all administrative proceedings under this federal law as well as " in § 55 para. 4 as well as § 102 para. 1 lit. h of the Water Rights Act 1959 (WRG), BGBl. 215 idF BGBl. I 87/2005 were unconstitutional. "

Faymann